Finally recognizing my lapse, I've now posted all my test photos, and also written a very lengthy, detailed analysis and digest of what I've found in testing the camera. In particular, I've taken some pains to clear up the misconceptions that seem to be floating around out there about aliasing, and also conducted a direct test of the SD9's "exposure headroom" in its RAW files. The latter of which confirmed my casual observations that there's relatively little headroom to be found, just a quarter-stop or less. My exposure headroom findings in particular are likely to be controversial, so I've provided cropped samples of the TIFF files I extracted with PhotoPro, so everyone could see what I did, and decide for themselves how much headroom is there. (I don't think there's much chance of disagreement, unfortunately.) To read all the details, visit the SD9 Test Photos page, or the Test Results section of the review. (Where you'll find the exposure headroom test information.)