Digital SLR prices continue to plunge (UPDATED) By
Mike Tomkins
(Monday, March 31, 2003 - 20:07 EST)
We told you last week that Sigma had adjusted pricing of its SD9 digital camera in light of Canon's EOS 10D, with both cameras now shipping at a cost of $1499.
It seems that Nikon has now adjusted the pricing of its popular D100, which for a while was the price-leader when it began shipping in July (pricing being about $200 less than Canon's $2200 EOS D60, and finally beaten in November by the Sigma SD9 at about $1800). The D100 is now available for $1700, reversing the situation from eight months ago and giving both Canon and Sigma an advantage of some $200. Fuji's FinePix S2 Pro meanwhile is still selling at about $2400, the same price it first shipped for last July. To help readers in choosing which cameras they should be considering, we're providing a brief summary of the features of each camera side-by-side below. Much of the decision will come down to individual preferences - for example, which lens mount you prefer, whether you want a Foveon imager or one with a color filter array, whether you prefer maximum resolution at the expense of a larger interpolated file size, etc. - but where a category has definite winner(s), they are marked with an orange cell: Manufacturer | Canon | Fuji | Nikon | Sigma | Model | EOS 10D | FinePix S2 Pro | D100 | SD9 | Price (street) | $1499 | $2399 | $1699 | $1489 | Effective Sensor Resolution | 6.29 megapixels | 6.1 megapixels | 6.0 megapixels | 3.43 megapixels | Resolution (strong detail; see reviews) | 1400 lines per picture height | 1600+ lines per picture height | 1200+ lines per picture height | 1000 lines per picture height | Sensor Size (mm) | 22.7 x 15.1 | 23 x 15.5 | 23.7 x 15.6 | 20.7 x 13.8 | Sensor Type | Canon CMOS | Fujifilm SuperCCD III | Unknown CCD | Foveon X3 CMOS | Color Filter | RGBG | RGBG | RGBG | None | Maximum Image Size | 3072 x 2048 | 4256 x 2848 (interpolated) | 3008 x 2000 | 2268 x 1512 | ISO sensitivity | 100 - 3200 | 100 - 1600 | 200 - 1600 | 100 - 400 | Body Material | Plastic / Magnesium Alloy | Plastic | Plastic / Metal | Plastic | Lens Mount | Canon EOS EF mount | Nikon F mount | Nikon F mount | Sigma SA bayonet mount | Lens Compatibility | All | Most lenses (see review for details) | Most lenses (see review for details) | All | Focal Length Multiplier | 1.54 | 1.52 | 1.49 | 1.69 | Autofocus | 7-point Multi-BASIS TTL | 5-point Multi-CAM 900 | 5-point Multi-CAM 900 | TTL Phase Difference Detection | Exposure | 35-area evaluative, center weighted, spot | 3D matrix, center-weighted average, spot | 3D matrix, center-weighted average, spot | 8-segment multi, center-weighted average, center | Shutter Speed | Bulb, 30 - 1/4000 sec. | 30 - 1/4000 sec. | Bulb, 30 - 1/4000 sec. | Bulb, 30 - 1/6000 sec. | Flash Sync | 1/200 sec.; up to 1/4000 sec. hi-speed sync with EX Speedlites possible | 1/125 sec. | 1/180 sec. | 1/180 sec. | Exposure Compensation | +/- 2EV in 1/2 or 1/3EV steps | +/- 3EV in 1/2EV steps | +/- 5EV in 1/2 or 1/3EV steps | +/- 3EV in 1/2EV steps | Burst Mode | 2.94fps for 9 frames | 2.88fps for 6 frames | 2.88fps for 9 frames | 1.79fps for 6 frames | File Formats | EXIF JPEG, RAW | EXIF JPEG, RAW, TIFF | EXIF JPEG, RAW, TIFF | RAW | Storage Medium | Type-I or Type-II CF, Microdrive | Type-I or Type-II CF, Microdrive; SmartMedia | Type-I or Type-II CF, Microdrive | Type-I or Type-II CF, Microdrive | Connectivity | USB 1.1 | USB 1.1, IEEE 1394 FireWire | USB 1.1 | USB 1.1, IEEE 1394 FireWire | Download Speed | 305KB / sec. | 1.15MB / sec. | 715KB / sec. | 268KB / sec. | Batteries | BP-511 proprietary Lithium Ion | 4 x AA + 2 x CR123A | EN-EL3 proprietary Lithium Ion | 4 x AA or 2 x CR-V3 + 2 x CR123A | Dimensions (W x H x D) | 150 x 107 x 75 mm | 142 x 132 x 79 mm | 144 x 116 x 81 mm | 152 x 120 x 79 mm | Weight with batteries | 875 grams | 850 grams | 780 grams | 950 grams | Review | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | Sample Images | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | Check Prices | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | (Click) | . |
UPDATED 2003-04-06 19:44ET: Thanks to IR reader Gary Berman for spotting an incorrect link in this news item, which has now been corrected...
|