Canon EOS 20DBy: Shawn Barnett and Dave EtchellsSlightly smaller and lighter upgrade brings greater speed and ease of use along with higher res and lower image noise. <<Reference: Datasheet :(Previous) | (Next): EOS 20D Imatest Results>> EOS 20D Sample ImagesReview First Posted: 08/19/2004, Update: 11/19/2004 |
Digital Cameras - Canon EOS-20D Test Images
I've begun including links in our reviews to a Thumber-generated index page for the test shots. The Thumber data includes a host of information on the images, including shutter speed, ISO setting, compression setting, etc. Rather than clutter the page below with *all* that detail, we're posting the Thumber index so only those interested in the information need wade through it! |
"Sunlit" Portrait: Outstanding resolution and detail, and accurate color. Good exposure as well, with strong detail in the midtones and highlights. The shot at right was taken with a +0.3 EV exposure compensation adjustment and the camera's contrast adjustment at its low setting, resulting in appropriate midtone densities with strong detail, yet no loss of detail in the highlights. (This is a much better result than I see with the majority of cameras I test.) The Auto and 4,900K white balance settings both produced accurate, nearly identical results, though I settled on the Auto setting for the main series. The Daylight and Manual options resulted in slightly warmer color balances. Overall color looks great here, with accurate skin tones. The blue flowers in the bouquet also look very good. (Many digicams have trouble with this blue, but the EOS-20D gets them almost exactly right.) The strong reds, greens, and yellows also look about right, though the bright red flowers are just slightly oversaturated. Resolution is excellent, and detail is strong throughout the frame, with very little loss of subtle detail to noise suppression processing, even in the dark shadows. Image noise is very low throughout the image. - Really, just an exceptional job. To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files E20OUTAP0.HTM
through E20OUTAP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page.
Contrast Series:
Saturation Series:
Color Tone Series:
Lens used in above tests: Canon Zoom EF 16-35mm 1:2.8L USM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Closer Portrait: Excellent resolution, detail, and color, and a good exposure. Color balance is similar to the wider shot above, with good skin tones and accurate color elsewhere. The shot at right was taken with a +1.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment, a fair bit higher than that required in the wider shot above. (This is unusual, most digicams require less exposure compensation on this shot.) Midtones show a lot of detail, and the highlights also remain fairly in check, once again thanks to the 20D's excellent contrast adjustment option. Resolution is again excellent, with a lot of fine, delicate detail visible throughout the frame. The fine details of Marti's face and hair are very strong, as are even the smallest fabric details in her white shirt and the green leaves. To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files E20OUTFACAP0.HTM
through E20OUTFACAP4.HTM on the thumbnail index
page. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indoor Portrait, Flash:
Low exposure with the default setting, but bright results with an EV boost. Good color accuracy, but the flowers are slightly washed out by the harsh light from the flash. The EOS-20D's built-in flash was slightly dim at the default exposure setting, requiring a +1.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment for a bright exposure. The strong, direct flash washes out Marti's skin tones, but overall color is about right, if a little flat. The background incandescent lighting creates a very slight orange cast on Marti's hair, and in some of the shadows on the back wall. To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.0 EV, see files E20INFP0.HTM
through E20INFP3.HTM on the thumbnail index page. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indoor Portrait, No Flash:
Very good color with the Manual and 2800K white balance, and a good exposure as well. This shot is always a very tough test of a camera's white balance capability, given the strong, yellowish color cast of the household incandescent bulbs used for the lighting. The EOS-20D's Auto and Incandescent white balance settings fell victim to this trap, and produced warm images. (NOTE though, that the Incandescent white balance option in a pro-level camera like the 20D is quite properly set to match the 3200K color temperature of professional tungsten studio lighting.) However, the Manual and 2,800K options produced very good results. I chose the Manual setting for the main series, as the 2,800K image was just a little warm for my taste. (Many users might prefer it as being more faithful to the original scene though, and I myself would use it if this were a picture in which I wanted to preserve a warmer mood.) Skin tones look very natural, and overall color is about right. The blue flowers in the bouquet are dark and purplish, but that's to be expected under this very warm-hued light source. The main shot was taken with a +0.7 EV exposure compensation adjustment, which resulted in strong detail in the highlights and good detail in the midtones and shadows. Another excellent performance. To view the entire exposure series from zero to +1.3 EV, see files E20INMP0.HTM
through E20INMP4.HTM on the thumbnail index page. ISO Series: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
House Shot:
Excellent resolution and a lot of fine detail. Good color as well. The EOS-20D's Auto and Manual
white balance settings produced similar results here, with good overall
color. The Daylight setting resulted in
a warmer cast. I chose the Manual setting for the main shot, though it
really wasn't all that different from the Auto shot. The white trim on
the house is almost neutral, though a hint warm, but overall color still
looks good. Resolution is excellent, and detail is strong in the front
shrubbery, as well as in the tree limbs above the roof. (The EOS-20D's
8.8-megapixel CCD stretches the limits of this poster as a test target,
however. Even though the poster was made from a 500MB scan of a 4x5 negative
shot with a tack-sharp lens, the EOS-20D extracts practically all of the
detail that's to be found here.) Details are a hint soft throughout the
frame, but definition is still quite good. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Far-Field Test Exceptional resolution and detail. This image is shot at infinity to test far-field lens performance. NOTE that this image cannot be directly compared to the other "house" shot, which is a poster, shot in the studio. The rendering of detail in the poster will be very different from in this shot, and color values (and even the presence or absence of leaves on the trees!) will vary in this subject as the seasons progress. In general though, you can evaluate detail in the bricks, shingles and window detail, and in the tree branches against the sky. Compression artifacts are most likely to show in the trim along the edge of the roof, in the bricks, or in the relatively "flat" areas in the windows. This is my ultimate "resolution shot,"
given the infinite range of detail in a natural scene like this, and the
EOS-20D does an excellent job. The camera captures incredible detail in
the tree limbs over the roof and fine foliage in front of the house, with
clear leaf patterns. House front details such as the brick pattern, shingles,
and trim also show great definition. The camera loses detail in the strongest
highlights of the white paint on the bay window, but doesn't appear to
be that far overexposed. (This shot was taken using the camera's default
contrast setting.) Detail is very strong
in the shadow area above the front door, evidence of the EOS-20D's good
dynamic range. Overall color looks good, but exposure is a slightly bright
overall. (No exposure compensation was used.) The table below shows a
standard resolution and quality series, followed by ISO, sharpness, contrast,
and saturation series. Resolution Series:
ISO Series:
Sharpness Series:
Contrast Series:
Saturation Series:
Lens used in above tests: Canon Zoom EF 16-35mm 1:2.8L USM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lens Zoom Range As do all D-SLRs, the EOS-20D supports a wide range of Canon lenses, so "Lens Zoom Range" really doesn't apply. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Musicians Poster
Slight color casts with each white balance setting, but good results overall. Excellent resolution with a lot of fine detail. This shot is often a tough test for digicams, as the abundance of blue
in the composition frequently tricks white balance systems into producing
a warm color balance. The EOS-20D's Daylight
white balance setting did produce a warm cast, but the Auto
setting actually produced near-accurate results (though skin tones are
pale). The Manual setting resulted in a stronger
magenta cast. Though overall color is slightly cool and skin tones are
pale with the Auto white balance, I chose it as the most accurate of the
three. The blue robe has purplish tints in the deep shadows, but otherwise
looks about right. Resolution is excellent, and fine detail is visible
throughout the frame. The embroidery of the blue robe has very good definition,
as do the instrument and accessory details of all three models. (The original
data file for this poster was only 20MB though, so cameras like the EOS-20D
are definitely capable of showing more detail than the poster has in it.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Macro Shot As with the Zoom Range, the EOS-20D's macro performance
will depend on the lens in use. (The Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro delivers
exceptional results if you're interested in some serious macro capability,
though.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Davebox" Test Target
Good color and exposure, with low image noise and strong shadow detail. The EOS-20D's Auto white balance setting produced
the best overall results here, though the Manual
setting came in at a close second. The Daylight
setting resulted in a warm image. Though the Auto setting was slightly
warm, I still preferred overall color to the slightly magenta cast of
the Manual setting. Exposure looks about right, and the EOS-20D has no
trouble with the subtle tonal variations of the Q60 target. The large
color blocks are accurate and well-saturated, though the large red and
blue primary color blocks are slightly oversaturated. Detail is strong
in the shadow area of the charcoal briquettes, and image noise is low. Lens used this test: Canon Macro EF 100mm 1:2.8 USM
Contrast Series:
Saturation Series:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low-Light Tests Excellent low-light performance, with bright exposures, good color, and very low image noise. Thanks to several recent improvements in Canon's CMOS sensor technology (several of which made their first appearance in the 1D Mark II), the EOS-20D's image noise levels are just amazingly low, particularly for an 8-megapixel chip. As a result, the 20D's low light performance is arguably the best I've yet seen from a digital camera, at any price point. The EOS-20D produced clear, clean images down to the 1/16 foot-candle (0.67 lux) limit of my test, with good color at all six ISO settings. Color balance turned slightly warm as the light level decreased, but the color shift was pretty minor. Because image noise was so low to begin with (there were essentially no "hot pixels" to be found anywhere), enabling or disabling the camera's Noise Reduction system didn't make a lot of difference, at least at the light levels that I cover in my tests. Even at ISO 3,200, image noise was relatively low, and didn't interfere with color balance or detail. The table below shows the best exposure I was able to obtain for each of a range of illumination levels. Images in this table (like all sample photos) are untouched, exactly as they came from the camera. (Note: If you'd like to use a light meter to
check light levels for subjects you might be interested in shooting, a
light level of one foot-candle corresponds to a normal exposure of two
seconds at f/2.8 and ISO 100.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flash Range Test With the "Kit" lens, an effective flash range of 9-10 feet at ISO 100. Because it obviously depends on lens aperture, flash range with the 20D will vary with the lens in use. In the US, it seems that at least some bundled versions of the 20D will be sold with the inexpensive 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 EF-S lens, so that was the lens I used to check flash range with. Using this lens, I found that the EOS-20D's flash provided adequate illumination at ISO 100 out to a range of roughly 9-10 feet. Given that the 20D's image noise levels are so low though, I'm sure that most
users would be comfortable operating it at ISO levels of 400 and even
higher. At ISO 400, the effective range would double relative to that
at ISO 100, for a usable range of 18-20 feet. Below is the flash range
series, with distances from eight to 14 feet from the target.
Lens used this test: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISO-12233 (WG-18) Resolution Test Very high resolution, 1,500 - 1,650 lines of "strong detail." The EOS-20D performed very well on the "laboratory" resolution test chart. It started showing artifacts in the test patterns at resolutions as low as 1,200 lines per picture height in the horizontal direction, and around 1,000 lines in the vertical direction. I found "strong detail" out to about 1,650 lines/picture height horizontally, 1,500 lines vertically. (Some reviewers will doubtless argue for higher figures than these, but I tend to be more conservative in how I "call" the resolution of cameras with this target. My rule of thumb is to not count lines of resolution beyond the point at which artifacts start to obscure the target lines, even though one's eye may see signs of the target lines beyond that point. Here, the target lines in the horizontally-oriented resolution hyperboloid (which tests for resolution along a vertical axis) show considerable aliasing beginning at about 1,500 lines, even though there's evidence of subject detail at least as far as 1,600 lines. Consequently, that's where I called the vertical resolution.) "Extinction" of the target patterns didn't occur until right at 2,000 lines. Very impressive. Looking at the results from Imatest, the EOS-20D (like most Canon cameras) uses a very restrained sharpening algorithm that leaves its images a little soft at the default settings, but that leaves the underlying subject detail undisturbed. Using Imatest's "MTF 50" weighting for determining resolution results, and a standard 1-pixel sharpening correction, the 20D resolved 1513 lines/picture height along the horizontal axis, and 1707 lines/picture height vertically, for an average of 1610 lines. Optical distortion on the EOS-20D will vary depending on the type of lens in use, hence no report of it here... Resolution Series, 100mm
Sharpness Series
Lens used this test: Canon Macro EF 100mm 1:2.8 USM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Viewfinder Accuracy/Flash Uniformity A pretty accurate optical viewfinder. The EOS-20D's digital SLR design proved fairly accurate, showing about 94 percent of the final frame. I prefer SLRs like the EOS-20D to have as close to 100 percent accuracy as possible, so the EOS-20D fell slightly short here, although it's important to note that most other d-SLRs have viewfinders that are only 95% accurate as well. Typically, only very high-end models like Canon's own EOS-1D Mark II and EOS-1Ds Mark II have true 100% viewfinders. Flash distribution is quite even, without any falloff in the corners or at the edges of the frame, but then this shot was captured with a 100mm lens, and you wouldn't expect to see any flash uniformity problems at such a long focal length. Lens used this test: Canon Macro EF 100mm 1:2.8 USM |
Reader Comments! --> Visit our discussion forum for the Canon EOS 20D!
Follow Imaging Resource: