Canon EOS M200 vs Sigma fp L

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Canon EOS M200 vs Sigma fp L

Leave Feedback

APS-C 332.3mm²
24.1 megapixels
ISO 100 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Canon EOS M200 Review.

35mm 864.0mm²
61.0 megapixels
ISO 100 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Sigma fp L Review.
See real-world photos taken with the fp L.

Buy From

Differences

Canon EOS M200 advantages over Sigma fp L

Tiltable Screen
Tiltable vs Fixed
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Yes vs No
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

315 vs 240 shots
Capture more photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Higher max flash sync
1/200 vs 1/15 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots

Sigma fp L advantages over Canon EOS M200

Larger sensor
35mm vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Newer
4 years vs 5 years old
Newer cameras often support more advanced features
More dots on screen
2100k vs 1040k dots
Can mean greater resolution or a brighter screen
Hot shoe
Hot shoe vs None
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
More pixels
61.0 vs 24.1 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Faster JPEG shooting
10.0 fps vs 6.1 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Faster shutter
1/8000 vs 1/4000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light
Higher extended ISO
102400 vs 25600 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Shoot 4K video
Both provide
Make sure you have a fast computer
Touchscreen
Both provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Slow-motion videos
Both provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

Common Weaknesses

Tilt-swivel screen
Neither provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Eye-level viewfinder
Neither provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-camera panoramas
Neither provide
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read fp L User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Canon EOS M200

Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Black)

Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Black)
Kit with 15-45mm Lens (White)

All EOS M200 Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sigma fp L

Review Excerpt

We haven’t reviewed the Canon EOS M200.
Read our Canon EOS M200 Hands-On Preview

We haven’t finished our review of the Sigma fp L, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Sigma fp L Shooter's Report

The Competition

Compared to Canon EOS M100

Canon EOS M200

Canon EOS M100

$499
APS-C

Shoot 4K video
Slow-motion videos

$449
APS-C

NFC

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Canon EOS M100

Sigma fp L

Canon EOS M100

$2499
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$449
APS-C

Tiltable Screen
Built-in Wi-Fi

Compare Sigma fp L vs Canon EOS M100

Compared to Fujifilm X-A5

Canon EOS M200

Fujifilm X-A5

$499
APS-C

Slower slow-motion

$499
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Fujifilm X-A5

Sigma fp L

Fujifilm X-A5

$2499
35mm

Larger sensor
Slower slow-motion

$499
APS-C

In-camera panoramas
Tiltable Screen

Compare Sigma fp L vs Fujifilm X-A5

Compared to Sigma fp

Canon EOS M200

Sigma fp

$499
APS-C

Less expensive
Tiltable Screen

$1699
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Sigma fp

Sigma fp L

Sigma fp

$2499
35mm

More pixels
Has anti-aliasing filter

$1699
35mm

Bigger pixels
Higher max flash sync

Compare Sigma fp L vs Sigma fp

Compared to Fujifilm X-A7

Canon EOS M200

Fujifilm X-A7

$499
APS-C

Slower slow-motion
Longer video battery life

$850
APS-C

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Fujifilm X-A7

Sigma fp L

Fujifilm X-A7

$2499
35mm

Larger sensor
Slower slow-motion

$850
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Sigma fp L vs Fujifilm X-A7

Compared to Sony A7C

Canon EOS M200

Sony A7C

$499
APS-C

Less expensive
More telephoto lens reach

$1648
35mm

Lens selection
Larger sensor

Compare Canon EOS M200 vs Sony A7C

Sigma fp L

Sony A7C

$2499
35mm

Thinner
More dots on screen

$1648
35mm

Tilt-swivel screen
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma fp L vs Sony A7C

Compare Other Cameras?