Nikon P1000 vs Olympus E-M1X

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus E-M1X

Leave Feedback

1/2.3 inch 28.1mm²
16.1 megapixels
24.00mm - 3000.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Nikon P1000 Review.
How does it shoot? Nikon P1000 in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the P1000.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Nikon P1000 conclusion.

4/3 226.2mm²
20.4 megapixels
ISO 200 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Olympus E-M1X Review.
How does it shoot? Olympus E-M1X in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the E-M1X.
Compare Olympus E-M1X image quality against competitors.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Olympus E-M1X conclusion.

Buy From

Differences

Nikon P1000 advantages over Olympus E-M1X

Less expensive
$997 vs $1699
Save money for lenses or accessories
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Higher max flash sync
1/4000 vs 1/250 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots

Olympus E-M1X advantages over Nikon P1000

Larger sensor
4/3 vs 1/2.3 inch
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
Bigger pixels
~ 3.36 vs 1.34 microns
Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
Touchscreen
Touch vs No touch
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
High resolution composite
Yes vs No
Combine multiple shots to form a super hi-res version
Fast startup
~0.80 vs 2.0 sec
Faster startup lets you catch the moment
Built-in GPS
GPS vs None
Geotag your photos
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

870 vs 250 shots
Capture more photos
Thinner
75 mm vs 181 mm
Thinner
Shoots 24p video
Yes vs No
Gives your movies a big-screen feel
Lighter weight
997g vs 1415g
Lighter weight
Higher-res screen
346k vs 230k pixels
More detail on the screen lets you judge focus and composition
More pixels
20.4 vs 16.1 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Dual card slots
Yes vs No
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Yes vs No
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Longer exposure
60 vs 30 sec
Long exposures for night shots
Faster JPEG shooting
60.7 fps vs 7.1 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Bigger JPEG buffer
49 vs 7 shots
Take more JPEG shots before waiting (burst mode)
Faster RAW shooting
60.7 fps vs 7.1 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Bigger RAW buffer
49 vs 7 shots
Larger buffer for RAW shots (burst mode)
Faster shutter
1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light
Higher extended ISO
25600 vs 6400 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Tilt-swivel screen
Both provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Rear display
Both provide
Review photos on the back of the camera
Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Eye-level viewfinder
Both provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Both provide
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Shoot 4K video
Both provide
Make sure you have a fast computer
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Built-in Wi-Fi
Both provide
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Both provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
External Mic Jack
Both provide
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Slow-motion videos
Both provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

Common Weaknesses

NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read P1000 User Reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read E-M1X User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Nikon P1000

Nikon P1000

All P1000 Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Olympus E-M1X

Body Only

All E-M1X Deals

Review Excerpt

Record-breaking 24-3000mm optical zoom lens with surprisingly good optical performance; Good image quality at low ISOs; VR works well; Fast AF in good lighting; RAW image capture.
Tiny sensor struggles with low-light/high ISO image quality; Lens dims quickly as you zoom; Sluggish low-light AF; Underwhelming C-AF performance; Shallow buffer depth; Poor battery life.
Read our Nikon P1000 Review

Terrific overall image quality for a 20MP 4/3" sensor; Very good high ISO performance this sensor size; Very impressive & improved AF performance; Extremely fast, responsive overall performance; New Intelligent Subject Detection AF feature works well; More video features; Outstanding IBIS.
Image quality not improved from (updated) E-M1 II; Faces tough competition with image quality at this price point, especially at higher ISOs; EVF feels somewhat outdated; Expensive for a Micro Four Thirds camera.
Read our Olympus E-M1X Review

The Competition

Compared to Fujifilm HS50EXR

Nikon P1000

Fujifilm HS50EXR

$997
1/2.3 inch

Shoot 4K video
Built-in Wi-Fi

$339
1/2 inch

Slower slow-motion
On-sensor phase detect

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Fujifilm HS50EXR

Olympus E-M1X

Fujifilm HS50EXR

$2240
4/3

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$339
1/2 inch

Slower slow-motion
In-camera panoramas

Compare Olympus E-M1X vs Fujifilm HS50EXR

Compared to Nikon P900

Nikon P1000

Nikon P900

$997
1/2.3 inch

Shoot 4K video
RAW file ability

$697
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
Fast startup

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Nikon P900

Olympus E-M1X

Nikon P900

$2240
4/3

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$697
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
In-camera panoramas

Compare Olympus E-M1X vs Nikon P900

Compared to Panasonic GH5

Nikon P1000

Panasonic GH5

$997
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
In-camera panoramas

$1348
4/3

Slower slow-motion
Larger sensor

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Panasonic GH5

Olympus E-M1X

Panasonic GH5

$2240
4/3

High resolution composite
Built-in GPS

$1348
4/3

Less expensive
Slower slow-motion

Compare Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH5

Compared to Nikon P950

Nikon P1000

Nikon P950

$997
1/2.3 inch

More telephoto lens reach
Longer exposure

$797
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
Lighter weight

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Nikon P950

Olympus E-M1X

Nikon P950

$2240
4/3

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$797
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
In-camera panoramas

Compare Olympus E-M1X vs Nikon P950

Compared to Panasonic GH6

Nikon P1000

Panasonic GH6

$997
1/2.3 inch

In-camera panoramas
Longer video battery life

$2200
4/3

Larger sensor
Slower slow-motion

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Panasonic GH6

Olympus E-M1X

Panasonic GH6

$2240
4/3

Built-in GPS
Longer video battery life

$2200
4/3

Slower slow-motion
Newer

Compare Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic GH6

Compare Other Cameras?