Nikon Z7 vs Fujifilm X-T200

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Nikon Z7 vs Fujifilm X-T200

Leave Feedback

35mm 858.0mm²
45.7 megapixels
ISO 64 - 25,600

Go in depth with our full Nikon Z7 Review.
How does it shoot? Nikon Z7 in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the Z7.
Compare Nikon Z7 image quality against competitors.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Nikon Z7 conclusion.

APS-C 369.0mm²
24.2 megapixels
ISO 200 - 12,800

Go in depth with our full Fujifilm X-T200 Review.
See real-world photos taken with the X-T200.

Succeeded by the Nikon Z7 II
Compare Z7 vs Z7 II
Compare Nikon Z7 II vs Fujifilm X-T200

Buy From

Differences

Nikon Z7 advantages over Fujifilm X-T200

Larger sensor
35mm vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

400 vs 270 shots
Capture more photos
Top deck display
Yes vs No
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
More pixels
45.7 vs 24.2 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Headphone jack
Yes vs No
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Lacks anti-aliasing filter
No Filter vs Filter
Enjoy sharper photos
Higher extended ISO
102400 vs 51200 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Fujifilm X-T200 advantages over Nikon Z7

Less expensive
$799 vs $3097
Save money for lenses or accessories
Tilt-swivel screen
Tilt-swivel vs tilt-only
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
More dots on screen
2760k vs 2100k dots
Can mean greater resolution or a brighter screen
Has anti-aliasing filter
Filter vs No Filter
Reduces unsightly moiré in photos
Faster shutter
1/32000 vs 1/8000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Eye-level viewfinder
Both provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
Shoot 4K video
Both provide
Make sure you have a fast computer
Touchscreen
Both provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
Built-in Wi-Fi
Both provide
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Both provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Both provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
External Mic Jack
Both provide
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Slow-motion videos
Both provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

Common Weaknesses

NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read Z7 User Reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read X-T200 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Nikon Z7

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 24-70mm f/4 S lens
Kit with 24-70mm f/4 S lens and FTZ adapter

All Z7 Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Fujifilm X-T200

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6

All X-T200 Deals

Review Excerpt

Familiar design in a compact form; Rugged build quality; Gorgeous EVF; Excellent image quality; Good autofocus; In-body image stabilization; Good 4K video recording.
Single card slot; Not as good at subject tracking as some Nikon DSLR cameras; Limited native lens selection (although adapter works well); Limited buffer depths.
Read our Nikon Z7 Review

We haven’t finished our review of the Fujifilm X-T200, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Fujifilm X-T200 Shooter's Report

The Competition

Compared to Sony A7 III

Nikon Z7

Sony A7 III

$2147
35mm

Top deck display
More dots on screen

$1531
35mm

Less expensive
Bigger pixels

Compare Nikon Z7 vs Sony A7 III

Fujifilm X-T200

Sony A7 III

$799
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

$1531
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony A7 III

Compared to Nikon Z6

Nikon Z7

Nikon Z6

$2147
35mm

More pixels
Lacks anti-aliasing filter

$1396
35mm

Less expensive
Bigger pixels

Compare Nikon Z7 vs Nikon Z6

Fujifilm X-T200

Nikon Z6

$799
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

$1396
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Fujifilm X-T200 vs Nikon Z6

Compared to Canon EOS R

Nikon Z7

Canon EOS R

$2147
35mm

In-Camera Image Stabilization
Fast startup

$1499
35mm

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Nikon Z7 vs Canon EOS R

Fujifilm X-T200

Canon EOS R

$799
APS-C

Less expensive
In-camera panoramas

$1499
35mm

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Fujifilm X-T200 vs Canon EOS R

Compared to Fujifilm X-T30

Nikon Z7

Fujifilm X-T30

$2147
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$849
APS-C

Less expensive
In-camera panoramas

Compare Nikon Z7 vs Fujifilm X-T30

Fujifilm X-T200

Fujifilm X-T30

$799
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Longer video battery life

$849
APS-C

Longer stills battery life
Doesn't require an AA filter

Compare Fujifilm X-T200 vs Fujifilm X-T30

Compared to Nikon Z fc

Nikon Z7

Nikon Z fc

$2147
35mm

Larger sensor
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$957
APS-C

Less expensive
Thinner

Compare Nikon Z7 vs Nikon Z fc

Fujifilm X-T200

Nikon Z fc

$799
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

$957
APS-C

Newer
Lacks anti-aliasing filter

Compare Fujifilm X-T200 vs Nikon Z fc

Compare Other Cameras?