• 1/2.3 inch 28.1mm2
  • 12.0 megapixels
  • 25.00mm - 100.00mm (35mm eq.)
  • 1/2.3 inch 28.1mm2
  • 14.2 megapixels
  • 24.00mm - 432.00mm (35mm eq.)

Buy From

Differences

Olympus TG-1 advantages over Samsung WB200F

  • Waterproof
    Yes vs No
    Take photos underwater without destroying your camera!
  • Larger lens aperture
    f/2.0 vs f/3.2
    Take photos in low-light or isolate your subject
  • HDMI out
    HDMI out vs None
    Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
  • Shoots 1080p video
    Yes vs No
    You'll want this if you shoot video
  • Shoots 60p video
    Yes vs No
    A faster framerate can give you more editing options
  • Higher extended ISO
    6400 vs 3200 ISO
    Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Samsung WB200F advantages over Olympus TG-1

  • Touchscreen
    Touch vs No touch
    Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi vs None
    Share your photos wirelessly
  • More telephoto lens reach
    432 mm vs 100 mm
    Capture objects farther away
  • Thinner
    21 mm vs 29 mm
    Thinner
  • More pixels
    14.2 vs 12.0 megapixels
    Higher resolution photos
  • Longer exposure
    16 vs 4 sec
    Long exposures for night shots

Similarities

Common Strengths

  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
    Both provide
    Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
  • Internal flash
    Both provide
    Useful in a pinch for fill flash

Common Weaknesses

  • Tilt-swivel screen
    Neither provide
    Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
  • Focus peaking
    Neither provide
    Your camera will highlight what's in focus
  • Eye-level viewfinder
    Neither provide
    You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
  • In-camera panoramas
    Neither provide
    Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
  • Tiltable Screen
    Neither provide
    Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
  • Built-in Bluetooth
    Neither provide
    Always-on wireless connectivity
  • Built-in GPS
    Neither provide
    Geotag your photos
  • On-sensor phase detect
    Neither provide
    Usually improves live view and video AF performance
  • Manual focus
    Neither provide
    AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
  • Integrated ND filter
    Neither provide
    Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
  • External Mic Jack
    Neither provide
    Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
  • Hot shoe
    Neither provide
    Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
  • Headphone jack
    Neither provide
    Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
  • Bulb shutter
    Neither provide
    Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
  • Slow-motion videos
    Neither provide
    Shoot slow-motion videos

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Olympus TG-1

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Samsung WB200F

Review Excerpt

  • Quality, grippable design; Bright and fast f/2.0 lens; Speedy autofocus, startup and shot-to-shot times; Built-in manometer and GPS.

  • Wide-angle photos typically underexposed; Moderate pincushion and barrel distortion; Muted colors; OLED monitor clips highlights.

  • Read our Olympus TG-1 Express Review

The Competition

Compared to Olympus TG-2

Olympus TG-1
Olympus TG-2
  • $400
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Shoots 60p video
  • $383
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Built-in GPS

Compare Olympus TG-1 vs Olympus TG-2

Samsung WB200F
Olympus TG-2
  • $0
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $383
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • In-camera panoramas

Compare Samsung WB200F vs Olympus TG-2

Compared to Pentax WG-3

Olympus TG-1
Pentax WG-3
  • $400
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Bigger pixels
  • Longer stills battery life
  • $289
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Manual focus

Compare Olympus TG-1 vs Pentax WG-3

Samsung WB200F
Pentax WG-3
  • $0
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $289
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • Larger lens aperture

Compare Samsung WB200F vs Pentax WG-3

Compared to Pentax WG-3 GPS

Olympus TG-1
Pentax WG-3 GPS
  • $400
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Bigger pixels
  • Fast startup
  • $229
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Built-in GPS

Compare Olympus TG-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Samsung WB200F
Pentax WG-3 GPS
  • $0
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $229
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • In-camera panoramas

Compare Samsung WB200F vs Pentax WG-3 GPS

Compared to Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Olympus TG-1
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • $400
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Bigger pixels
  • Longer stills battery life
  • $380
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • In-camera panoramas
  • Built-in GPS

Compare Olympus TG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Samsung WB200F
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • $0
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $380
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • In-camera panoramas

Compare Samsung WB200F vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Compared to Ricoh WG-4

Olympus TG-1
Ricoh WG-4
  • $400
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Bigger pixels
  • Longer stills battery life
  • $330
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • In-camera panoramas

Compare Olympus TG-1 vs Ricoh WG-4

Samsung WB200F
Ricoh WG-4
  • $0
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Touchscreen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • $330
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • In-camera panoramas

Compare Samsung WB200F vs Ricoh WG-4

Compare Other Cameras?