• 1/2.3 inch 28.1mm2
  • 14.0 megapixels
  • 28.00mm - 102.00mm (35mm eq.)
  • 1/2.3 inch 28.1mm2
  • 20.0 megapixels
  • 28.00mm - 224.00mm (35mm eq.)

Buy From

Differences

Olympus TG-320 advantages over Canon 160

  • Waterproof
    Yes vs No
    Take photos underwater without destroying your camera!
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
    Yes vs No
    Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
  • Bigger pixels
    ~ 1.44 vs 1.20 microns
    Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
  • HDMI out
    HDMI out vs None
    Use HDMI output to monitor or review video

Canon 160 advantages over Olympus TG-320

  • Less expensive
    $120 vs $180 (MSRP)
    Save money for lenses or accessories
  • More telephoto lens reach
    224 mm vs 102 mm
    Capture objects farther away
  • Longer stills battery life
    More info 230 vs 190 shots
    Capture more photos
  • More pixels
    20.0 vs 14.0 megapixels
    Higher resolution photos
  • Longer exposure
    15 vs 4 sec
    Long exposures for night shots
  • Faster JPEG shooting
    0.8 fps vs 0.6 fps
    Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)

Similarities

Common Strengths

  • Internal flash
    Both provide
    Useful in a pinch for fill flash

Common Weaknesses

  • Focus peaking
    Neither provide
    Your camera will highlight what's in focus
  • Tilt-swivel screen
    Neither provide
    Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
  • Eye-level viewfinder
    Neither provide
    You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
  • Touchscreen
    Neither provide
    Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
  • In-camera panoramas
    Neither provide
    Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
  • Tiltable Screen
    Neither provide
    Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
  • RAW file ability
    Neither provide
    Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
    Neither provide
    Share your photos wirelessly
  • NFC
    Neither provide
    Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
  • Built-in Bluetooth
    Neither provide
    Always-on wireless connectivity
  • Built-in GPS
    Neither provide
    Geotag your photos
  • On-sensor phase detect
    Neither provide
    Usually improves live view and video AF performance
  • Manual focus
    Neither provide
    AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
  • Integrated ND filter
    Neither provide
    Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
  • External Mic Jack
    Neither provide
    Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
  • Hot shoe
    Neither provide
    Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
  • Headphone jack
    Neither provide
    Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
  • Bulb shutter
    Neither provide
    Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
  • Slow-motion videos
    Neither provide
    Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Olympus TG-320

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Canon 160
Canon 160 (Black)
  • Canon 160 (Black)
  • Canon 160 (Red)
  • Canon 160 (Silver)
  • Canon 160 (White)
  • red test
  • red test
All 160 Deals

Review Excerpt

The Competition

Compared to Panasonic DMC-TS10

Olympus TG-320
Panasonic DMC-TS10
  • $193
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Waterproof
  • $250
  • 1/2.33 inch
  • More telephoto lens reach
  • Longer stills battery life

Compare Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic DMC-TS10

Canon 160
Panasonic DMC-TS10
  • $340
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More telephoto lens reach
  • $250
  • 1/2.33 inch
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
  • Bigger pixels

Compare Canon 160 vs Panasonic DMC-TS10

Compared to Olympus TG-310

Olympus TG-320
Olympus TG-310
  • $193
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • Longer stills battery life
  • $156
  • 1/2.3 inch

Compare Olympus TG-320 vs Olympus TG-310

Canon 160
Olympus TG-310
  • $340
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More telephoto lens reach
  • $156
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
  • Bigger pixels

Compare Canon 160 vs Olympus TG-310

Compared to Sony WX80

Olympus TG-320
Sony WX80
  • $193
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • Bigger JPEG buffer
  • $300
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Focus peaking
  • Built-in Wi-Fi

Compare Olympus TG-320 vs Sony WX80

Canon 160
Sony WX80
  • $340
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More pixels
  • $300
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Focus peaking
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Canon 160 vs Sony WX80

Compared to Sony TF1

Olympus TG-320
Sony TF1
  • $193
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • HDMI out
  • Longer exposure
  • $300
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Focus peaking
  • More dots on screen

Compare Olympus TG-320 vs Sony TF1

Canon 160
Sony TF1
  • $340
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • More telephoto lens reach
  • $300
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • Focus peaking

Compare Canon 160 vs Sony TF1

Compared to Canon 130 IS

Olympus TG-320
Canon 130 IS
  • $193
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Waterproof
  • $420
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Built-in Wi-Fi
  • More telephoto lens reach

Compare Olympus TG-320 vs Canon 130 IS

Canon 160
Canon 130 IS
  • $340
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • Less expensive
  • Longer stills battery life
  • $420
  • 1/2.3 inch
  • In-Camera Image Stabilization
  • Built-in Wi-Fi

Compare Canon 160 vs Canon 130 IS

Compare Other Cameras?