Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Fujifilm X-T100

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Fujifilm X-T100

Leave Feedback

APS-C 369.0mm²
19.6 megapixels
45.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Sigma dp2 Quattro Review.
How does it shoot? Sigma dp2 Quattro in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the dp2 Quattro.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Sigma dp2 Quattro conclusion.

APS-C 369.0mm²
24.2 megapixels
ISO 200 - 12,800

Go in depth with our full Fujifilm X-T100 Review.
See real-world photos taken with the X-T100.

Succeeded by the Fujifilm X-T200
Compare X-T100 vs X-T200
Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Fujifilm X-T200

Buy From

Differences

Sigma dp2 Quattro advantages over Fujifilm X-T100

Higher max flash sync
1/1250 vs 1/180 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots
Doesn't require an AA filter
Yes vs No
A unique sensor design provides sharp photos without moiré

Fujifilm X-T100 advantages over Sigma dp2 Quattro

Less expensive
$599 vs $899*
Save money for lenses or accessories
Tilt-swivel screen
Tilt-swivel vs none
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Focus peaking
Peaker vs Non-peaker
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Eye-level viewfinder
Eye-level vs Rear display only
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
Shoot 4K video
4K (UHD) vs No
Make sure you have a fast computer
Touchscreen
Touch vs No touch
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Yes vs No
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

430 vs 200 shots
Capture more photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Thinner
47 mm vs 81 mm
Thinner
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Newer
7 years vs 10 years old
Newer cameras often support more advanced features
HDMI out
HDMI out vs None
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Shoots 24p video
Yes vs No
Gives your movies a big-screen feel
Shoots 1080p video
Yes vs No
You'll want this if you shoot video
More pixels
24.2 vs 19.6 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Bulb shutter
Bulb vs No bulb
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Faster JPEG shooting
6.0 fps vs 3.7 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Bigger JPEG buffer
58 vs 7 shots
Take more JPEG shots before waiting (burst mode)
Faster RAW shooting
6.0 fps vs 3.7 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Bigger RAW buffer
16 vs 7 shots
Larger buffer for RAW shots (burst mode)
Slow-motion videos
Yes vs No
Shoot slow-motion videos
Faster shutter
1/32000 vs 1/2000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light
Higher extended ISO
51200 vs 6400 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Rear display
Both provide
Review photos on the back of the camera
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities

Common Weaknesses

In-Camera Image Stabilization
Neither provide
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Integrated ND filter
Neither provide
Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read X-T100 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma DP2 Quattro

All dp2 Quattro Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Fujifilm X-T100

Body Only (Black)

Body Only (Black)
Body Only (Champagne Gold)
Body Only (Dark Silver)
Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Black)
Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Champagne Gold)
Kit with 15-45mm Lens (Dark Silver)

All X-T100 Deals

Review Excerpt

Phenomenal detail and "depth" at low ISOs; Extremely high resolution; Incredible image quality for the price and size (at low ISOs); Fast x-sync speeds; Unique design is unconventional but comfortable and balanced.
Poor high ISO performance; Very sluggish buffer clearing; Poor low-light AF; No built-in flash; Very limited third-party RAW file support; Bundled Sigma Photo Pro RAW software is slow and buggy.
Read our Sigma dp2 Quattro Review

We haven’t finished our review of the Fujifilm X-T100, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Fujifilm X-T100 Shooter's Report

The Competition

Compared to Sigma DP1 Merrill

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma DP1 Merrill

$899
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach
Longer stills battery life

$849
APS-C

Bigger pixels
Wider angle lens

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Fujifilm X-T100

Sigma DP1 Merrill

$599
APS-C

Focus peaking
Tilt-swivel screen

$849
APS-C

Bigger pixels
Doesn't require an AA filter

Compare Fujifilm X-T100 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Compared to Sigma dp1 Quattro

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma dp1 Quattro

$899
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach

$999
APS-C

Wider angle lens

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma dp1 Quattro

Fujifilm X-T100

Sigma dp1 Quattro

$599
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Focus peaking

$999
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Doesn't require an AA filter

Compare Fujifilm X-T100 vs Sigma dp1 Quattro

Compared to Sigma dp3 Quattro

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma dp3 Quattro

$899
APS-C

Wider angle lens

$999
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma dp3 Quattro

Fujifilm X-T100

Sigma dp3 Quattro

$599
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Focus peaking

$999
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Doesn't require an AA filter

Compare Fujifilm X-T100 vs Sigma dp3 Quattro

Compared to Sony A6400

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sony A6400

$899
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Doesn't require an AA filter

$798
APS-C

Focus peaking
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sony A6400

Fujifilm X-T100

Sony A6400

$599
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

$798
APS-C

Slower slow-motion
Fast startup

Compare Fujifilm X-T100 vs Sony A6400

Compared to Sony A6100

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sony A6100

$899
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Doesn't require an AA filter

$673
APS-C

Less expensive
Focus peaking

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sony A6100

Fujifilm X-T100

Sony A6100

$599
APS-C

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

$673
APS-C

Slower slow-motion
NFC

Compare Fujifilm X-T100 vs Sony A6100

Compare Other Cameras?