Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Nikon D810

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Nikon D810

Leave Feedback

APS-C 369.0mm²
19.6 megapixels
45.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Sigma dp2 Quattro Review.
How does it shoot? Sigma dp2 Quattro in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the dp2 Quattro.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Sigma dp2 Quattro conclusion.

35mm 861.6mm²
36.3 megapixels
ISO 64 - 12,800

Go in depth with our full Nikon D810 Review.
How does it shoot? Nikon D810 in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the D810.
Compare Nikon D810 image quality against competitors.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Nikon D810 conclusion.

Succeeded by the Nikon D850
Compare D810 vs D850
Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Nikon D850

Buy From

Differences

Sigma dp2 Quattro advantages over Nikon D810

Less expensive
$899* vs $4097
Save money for lenses or accessories
Higher max flash sync
1/1250 vs 1/250 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots
Lighter weight
489g vs 988g
Lighter weight
Doesn't require an AA filter
Yes vs No
A unique sensor design provides sharp photos without moiré

Nikon D810 advantages over Sigma dp2 Quattro

Larger sensor
35mm vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
Eye-level viewfinder
Eye-level vs Rear display only
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
Fast startup
~0.50 vs 3.0 sec
Faster startup lets you catch the moment
Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

1200 vs 200 shots
Capture more photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Top deck display
Yes vs No
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
HDMI out
HDMI out vs None
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Shoots 24p video
Yes vs No
Gives your movies a big-screen feel
Shoots 1080p video
Yes vs No
You'll want this if you shoot video
Less shutter lag
0.21 vs 0.39 sec
Focus and take a photo quickly (wide angle)
More pixels
36.3 vs 19.6 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Dual card slots
Yes vs No
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Yes vs No
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Bulb shutter
Bulb vs No bulb
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Faster JPEG shooting
5.1 fps vs 3.7 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Bigger JPEG buffer
57 vs 7 shots
Take more JPEG shots before waiting (burst mode)
Faster RAW shooting
5.1 fps vs 3.7 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Bigger RAW buffer
23 vs 7 shots
Larger buffer for RAW shots (burst mode)
Faster shutter
1/8000 vs 1/2000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light
Higher extended ISO
51200 vs 6400 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Rear display
Both provide
Review photos on the back of the camera
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities

Common Weaknesses

Tilt-swivel screen
Neither provide
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Focus peaking
Neither provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Neither provide
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Touchscreen
Neither provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
In-camera panoramas
Neither provide
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Tiltable Screen
Neither provide
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
Built-in Wi-Fi
Neither provide
Share your photos wirelessly
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in Bluetooth
Neither provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
On-sensor phase detect
Neither provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Slow-motion videos
Neither provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read D810 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma DP2 Quattro

All dp2 Quattro Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Nikon D810

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 24-120mm lens

All D810 Deals

Review Excerpt

Phenomenal detail and "depth" at low ISOs; Extremely high resolution; Incredible image quality for the price and size (at low ISOs); Fast x-sync speeds; Unique design is unconventional but comfortable and balanced.
Poor high ISO performance; Very sluggish buffer clearing; Poor low-light AF; No built-in flash; Very limited third-party RAW file support; Bundled Sigma Photo Pro RAW software is slow and buggy.
Read our Sigma dp2 Quattro Review

Handles even better than its predecessors; Absolutely spectacular images from the 36-megapixel image sensor; Unusually wide sensitivity range for its resolution; Improved performance and buffer depths; Improved video feature set; Impressive low-light autofocus
Prone to moire and false color with some subjects; No longer available with a low-pass filter; Demands excellent lenses for the best detail; White balance tends warm under tungsten lighting
Read our Nikon D810 Review

The Competition

Compared to Canon 5D Mark IV

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Canon 5D Mark IV

$899
APS-C

Less expensive
Higher max flash sync

$2249
35mm

Larger sensor
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Canon 5D Mark IV

Nikon D810

Canon 5D Mark IV

$2278
35mm

Longer stills battery life
Internal flash

$2249
35mm

Less expensive
Shoot 4K video

Compare Nikon D810 vs Canon 5D Mark IV

Compared to Sigma DP1 Merrill

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma DP1 Merrill

$899
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach
Longer stills battery life

$849
APS-C

Bigger pixels
Wider angle lens

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Nikon D810

Sigma DP1 Merrill

$2278
35mm

Larger sensor
Eye-level viewfinder

$849
APS-C

Lighter weight
Doesn't require an AA filter

Compare Nikon D810 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Compared to Nikon D800E

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Nikon D800E

$899
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Lighter weight

$2212
35mm

Larger sensor
Eye-level viewfinder

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Nikon D800E

Nikon D810

Nikon D800E

$2278
35mm

Longer stills battery life
Faster JPEG shooting

$2212
35mm

Fast startup

Compare Nikon D810 vs Nikon D800E

Compared to Sigma dp1 Quattro

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma dp1 Quattro

$899
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach

$999
APS-C

Wider angle lens

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma dp1 Quattro

Nikon D810

Sigma dp1 Quattro

$2278
35mm

Larger sensor
Eye-level viewfinder

$999
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Lighter weight

Compare Nikon D810 vs Sigma dp1 Quattro

Compared to Sigma dp3 Quattro

Sigma dp2 Quattro

Sigma dp3 Quattro

$899
APS-C

Wider angle lens

$999
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach

Compare Sigma dp2 Quattro vs Sigma dp3 Quattro

Nikon D810

Sigma dp3 Quattro

$2278
35mm

Larger sensor
Eye-level viewfinder

$999
APS-C

Higher max flash sync
Lighter weight

Compare Nikon D810 vs Sigma dp3 Quattro

Compare Other Cameras?