Sigma sd Quattro vs Nikon P1000

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sigma sd Quattro vs Nikon P1000

Leave Feedback

APS-C 364.3mm²
19.6 megapixels
ISO 100 - 6400

Go in depth with our full Sigma sd Quattro Review.
See real-world photos taken with the sd Quattro.

1/2.3 inch 28.1mm²
16.1 megapixels
24.00mm - 3000.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Nikon P1000 Review.
How does it shoot? Nikon P1000 in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the P1000.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Nikon P1000 conclusion.

Buy From

Differences

Sigma sd Quattro advantages over Nikon P1000

Larger sensor
APS-C vs 1/2.3 inch
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
Bigger pixels
~ 4.33 vs 1.34 microns
Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Thinner
90 mm vs 181 mm
Thinner
Lighter weight
625g vs 1415g
Lighter weight
More dots on screen
1620k vs 922k dots
Can mean greater resolution or a brighter screen
More pixels
19.6 vs 16.1 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Doesn't require an AA filter
Yes vs No
A unique sensor design provides sharp photos without moiré
Bigger RAW buffer
14 vs 7 shots
Larger buffer for RAW shots (burst mode)

Nikon P1000 advantages over Sigma sd Quattro

Tilt-swivel screen
Tilt-swivel vs none
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Shoot 4K video
4K (UHD) vs No
Make sure you have a fast computer
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Built-in Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi vs None
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Yes vs No
Always-on wireless connectivity
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Higher max flash sync
1/4000 vs 1/180 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots
Shoots 1080p video
Yes vs No
You'll want this if you shoot video
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Faster RAW shooting
7.1 fps vs 3.6 fps
Faster RAW shooting in burst mode
Slow-motion videos
Yes vs No
Shoot slow-motion videos

Similarities

Common Strengths

Rear display
Both provide
Review photos on the back of the camera
Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Eye-level viewfinder
Both provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.
HDMI out
Both provide
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Common Weaknesses

Touchscreen
Neither provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
NFC
Neither provide
Simplifies pairing your camera with supported phones
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read P1000 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sigma sd Quattro

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 30mm f/1.4 Art Lens

All sd Quattro Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Nikon P1000

Nikon P1000

All P1000 Deals

Review Excerpt

We haven’t finished our review of the Sigma sd Quattro, but we have extensive sample photos and a hands-on report.
Read our Sigma sd Quattro Shooter's Report

Record-breaking 24-3000mm optical zoom lens with surprisingly good optical performance; Good image quality at low ISOs; VR works well; Fast AF in good lighting; RAW image capture.
Tiny sensor struggles with low-light/high ISO image quality; Lens dims quickly as you zoom; Sluggish low-light AF; Underwhelming C-AF performance; Shallow buffer depth; Poor battery life.
Read our Nikon P1000 Review

The Competition

Compared to Sony A3000

Sigma sd Quattro

Sony A3000

$699
APS-C

On-sensor phase detect
HDMI out

$598
APS-C

Lens selection
In-camera panoramas

Compare Sigma sd Quattro vs Sony A3000

Nikon P1000

Sony A3000

$997
1/2.3 inch

Tilt-swivel screen
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$598
APS-C

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Sony A3000

Compared to Nikon P900

Sigma sd Quattro

Nikon P900

$699
APS-C

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$697
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
Tilt-swivel screen

Compare Sigma sd Quattro vs Nikon P900

Nikon P1000

Nikon P900

$997
1/2.3 inch

Shoot 4K video
RAW file ability

$697
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
Fast startup

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Nikon P900

Compared to Sigma sd Quattro H

Sigma sd Quattro

Sigma sd Quattro H

$699
APS-C

Bigger RAW buffer

$1199
APS-H

Larger sensor
More pixels

Compare Sigma sd Quattro vs Sigma sd Quattro H

Nikon P1000

Sigma sd Quattro H

$997
1/2.3 inch

Tilt-swivel screen
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$1199
APS-H

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Sigma sd Quattro H

Compared to Fujifilm X-H1

Sigma sd Quattro

Fujifilm X-H1

$699
APS-C

More dots on screen

$1199
APS-C

Lens selection
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Sigma sd Quattro vs Fujifilm X-H1

Nikon P1000

Fujifilm X-H1

$997
1/2.3 inch

Tilt-swivel screen
Longer video battery life

$1199
APS-C

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Fujifilm X-H1

Compared to Nikon P950

Sigma sd Quattro

Nikon P950

$699
APS-C

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$797
1/2.3 inch

Tilt-swivel screen
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Sigma sd Quattro vs Nikon P950

Nikon P1000

Nikon P950

$997
1/2.3 inch

More telephoto lens reach
Longer exposure

$797
1/2.3 inch

Less expensive
Lighter weight

Compare Nikon P1000 vs Nikon P950

Compare Other Cameras?