Sony A65 vs Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sony A65 vs Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Leave Feedback

APS-C 369.7mm²
24.3 megapixels
ISO 100 - 16,000

Go in depth with our full Sony A65 Review.
See real-world photos taken with the A65.

35mm 864.0mm²
24.0 megapixels
ISO 200 - 6400

Go in depth with our full Leica M-P (Typ 240) Review.

Buy From

Differences

Sony A65 advantages over Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Tilt-swivel screen
Tilt-swivel vs none
Tilt and swivel the screen for maximum shooting flexibility
Lens selection
Good vs Limited
Better lens selection gives you more options
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Yes vs No
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Built-in GPS
GPS vs None
Geotag your photos
Internal flash
Internal flash vs None
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
HDMI out
HDMI out vs None
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Has anti-aliasing filter
Filter vs No Filter
Reduces unsightly moiré in photos
Faster JPEG shooting
10.0 fps vs 3.0 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Higher extended ISO
25600 vs 6400 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Leica M-P (Typ 240) advantages over Sony A65

Larger sensor
35mm vs APS-C
More sensor area. Bigger is (generally) better.
Bigger pixels
~ 6.05 vs 3.95 microns
Better low-light and dynamic range (all else equal)
Higher effective ISO

Higher effective ISO

Maximum effective ISO is an estimate of the highest sensitivity at which a camera can capture excellent quality photos.

Cameras with higher effective ISO will be better choices for indoor photography, night shooting, and indoor sports photography, especially if you intend to make large prints.

You can learn more at our glossary entry.

Maximum effective ISO test data courtesy of DxO Mark.
M-P (Typ 240) test data on DxO Mark A65 test data on DxO Mark

1,860 vs 717 iso
Take photos in low light with less noise
Thinner
42 mm vs 80 mm
Thinner
Lacks anti-aliasing filter
No Filter vs Filter
Enjoy sharper photos

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
Eye-level viewfinder
Both provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
Hot shoe
Both provide
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Bulb shutter
Both provide
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures

Common Weaknesses

Touchscreen
Neither provide
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
Built-in Wi-Fi
Neither provide
Share your photos wirelessly
Built-in Bluetooth
Neither provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
On-sensor phase detect
Neither provide
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
Top deck display
Neither provide
Check settings with a screen on top of the camera
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Slow-motion videos
Neither provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read A65 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sony A65

Body Only

Body Only
Kit with 18-55m Lens

All A65 Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Body Only (Black)

Body Only (Black)
Body Only (Silver)

All M-P (Typ 240) Deals

Review Excerpt

We haven’t reviewed the Sony A65.
Read our Sony A65 Initial Test

We haven’t reviewed the Leica M-P (Typ 240).
Read our Leica M-P (Typ 240) Preview

The Competition

Compared to Nikon D3200

Sony A65

Nikon D3200

$798
APS-C

Focus peaking
Tilt-swivel screen

$477
APS-C

Lens selection
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Nikon D3200

Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Nikon D3200

$7495
35mm

Focus peaking
Larger sensor

$477
APS-C

Lens selection
Less expensive

Compare Leica M-P (Typ 240) vs Nikon D3200

Compared to Nikon D5200

Sony A65

Nikon D5200

$798
APS-C

Focus peaking
In-Camera Image Stabilization

$500
APS-C

Lens selection
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Nikon D5200

Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Nikon D5200

$7495
35mm

Focus peaking
Larger sensor

$500
APS-C

Lens selection
Less expensive

Compare Leica M-P (Typ 240) vs Nikon D5200

Compared to Sony A58

Sony A65

Sony A58

$798
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Built-in GPS

$598
APS-C

Less expensive
Fast startup

Compare Sony A65 vs Sony A58

Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Sony A58

$7495
35mm

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

$598
APS-C

Lens selection
In-Camera Image Stabilization

Compare Leica M-P (Typ 240) vs Sony A58

Compared to Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)

Sony A65

Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)

$798
APS-C

Tilt-swivel screen
Lens selection

$7595
35mm

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Sony A65 vs Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)

Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)

$7495
35mm

$7595
35mm

Longer exposure
Higher extended ISO

Compare Leica M-P (Typ 240) vs Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)

Compared to Leica M-D (Typ 262)

Sony A65

Leica M-D (Typ 262)

$798
APS-C

Rear display
Lens selection

$5995
35mm

Larger sensor
Bigger pixels

Compare Sony A65 vs Leica M-D (Typ 262)

Leica M-P (Typ 240)

Leica M-D (Typ 262)

$7495
35mm

Rear display
Focus peaking

$5995
35mm

Longer exposure

Compare Leica M-P (Typ 240) vs Leica M-D (Typ 262)

Compare Other Cameras?