Nikon L2 Exposure

Saturation & Hue Accuracy
Good overall color, though some oversaturation in strong reds and blues.

Most consumer digital cameras produce color that's more highly saturated (more intense) than found in the original subjects. This is simply because most people like their color a bit brighter than life. The Nikon Coolpix L2 produced good overall saturation, with slight oversaturation in the strong reds, blues, and yellows. Where oversaturation is most problematic is on Caucasian skin tones, as it's very easy for these "memory colors" to be seen as too bright, too pink, too yellow, etc. Here, however, the L2 produced good results.

The other important part of color rendition is hue accuracy. Hue is "what color" the color is. The L2 did push reds a little toward orange, and oranges toward yellow, but overall color looked good and realistic.

Exposure and White Balance

Indoors, incandescent lighting
Good color balance with the Manual white balance option, about average positive exposure compensation required.

Color balance indoors under incandescent lighting was warm and reddish in Auto white balance mode, and the Incandescent setting resulted in stronger yellow color balance. However, the Manual option produced nearly accurate results, if slightly greenish. The Nikon Coolpix L2 required a +1.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment for a bright exposure, though the highlights on Marti's shirt are bordering on too hot. Overall color looks pretty good, even in the blue flowers. (Many digital cameras push the blue flowers toward a darker, more purple hue.) Our test lighting for this shot is a mixture of 60 and 100 watt household incandescent bulb, a pretty yellow light source, but a very common one in typical home settings here in the US.

Outdoors, daylight
Good color balance, very bright colors. Better than average exposure accuracy.

The Nikon L2's Outdoor shots generally showed accurate exposure with pretty good highlights. Shadow detail was limited, with some visible noise suppression. Exposure accuracy overall was better than average, the camera requiring less exposure compensation than we're accustomed to seeing with consumer digicams.

See full set of test images with explanations
See thumbnails of all test and gallery images

Resolution
High resolution, 1,200 lines of strong detail.

Our laboratory resolution chart revealed sharp, distinct line patterns down to about 1,200 lines per picture height from the Nikon Coolpix L2, with extinction at around 1,650. Use these numbers to compare with other cameras of similar resolution, or use them to see just what higher resolution can mean in terms of potential detail. Beware that while you might be able to make out what looks like distinct lines at numbers higher than those we've mentioned here, the camera is just doing its best to continue interpreting the lines.

See full set of test images with explanations
See thumbnails of all test and gallery images

Sharpness & Detail
Fairly sharp images, though some blurring of detail from noise suppression.

The Nikon Coolpix L2's images are slightly soft at telephoto, somewhat sharper at wide angle. I noticed only subtle over-sharpening and edge enhancement on the camera's part in high contrast scenes like the one above. (Edge enhancement creates the illusion of sharpness by enhancing colors and tones right at the edge of a rapid transition in color or tone.)

Noise-suppression systems in digital cameras tend to flatten-out detail in areas of subtle contrast. The effects can often be seen in shots of human hair, where the individual strands are lost and an almost "watercolor" look appears. The crop at far right shows this slightly, though there is still a considerable amount of visible noise. The darker areas of Marti's hair show limited detail, though the Nikon L2 does capture quite a bit of fine detail in the brighter strands of hair.

ISO & Noise Performance
The Coolpix L2's automatically controlled ISO setting produced moderately high noise, even at its lower setting.

The Nikon Coolpix L2 automatically adjusts the ISO sensitivity, anywhere from 64 to 200. The shot above was taken at around ISO 80, and shows moderately high image noise, with blurry fine detail.

Extremes: Sunlit and low light tests
High resolution with pretty good overall detail, though limited shadow detail. Limited low-light capabilities, though capable of capturing bright images under average city street lighting and slightly darker conditions.

Sunlight:
Because digital cameras are more like slide film than negative film (in that they tend to have a more limited tonal range), we test them in the harshest situations to see how they handle scenes with bright highlights and dark shadows, as well as what kind of sensitivity they have in low light. The shot above is designed to mimic the very harsh, contrasty effect of direct noonday sunlight, a very tough challenge for most digital cameras. (You can read details of this test here.)

The Nikon Coolpix L2 had a little trouble with the deliberately harsh lighting in the test above, producing high contrast and a dim overall exposure. Detail is limited in the shadow areas, partly from some noise suppression. The difference between the exposures taken at +0.3 and +0.7 EV is very slight, though the jump to +1.0 EV results in too bright of an image. (In "real life" though, be sure to use fill flash in situations like the one shown above; it's better to shoot in the shade when possible.)

Low light:
The Nikon Coolpix L2's exposure system was somewhat limited in low lighting, though the camera captured fairly bright results down to the 1/2 foot-candle light level in its Night mode. In its Night Landscape mode, images were just a little dim at even the one foot-candle light level (about the equivalent of average city street lighting at night). The camera's autofocus system worked well down to the 1/4 foot-candle light level unassisted. Do keep in mind though, that the longer shutter times associated with the Night modes demand the use of a tripod or other camera support to get sharp photos. (A useful trick is to just prop the camera on a convenient surface, and use its self-timer to release the shutter. This avoids any jiggling from your finger pressing the shutter button, and can work quite well when you don't have a tripod handy.)

NOTE: This low light test is conducted with a stationary subject, and the camera mounted on a sturdy tripod. Most digital cameras will fail miserably when faced with a moving subject in dim lighting. (For example, a child's ballet recital or a holiday pageant in a gymnasium.) For such applications, you may have better luck with a digital SLR camera, but even there, you'll likely need to set the focus manually. For information and reviews on digital SLRs, refer to our SLR review index page.

Coverage and Range
A slightly weak flash, our standard shots required quite a bit of positive exposure compensation.

Flash coverage was uneven at wide angle, though much more uniform at telephoto. In the Indoor test, the Nikon Coolpix L2's flash underexposed our subject at its default setting, requiring a much higher than average +2.0 EV exposure compensation adjustment to get reasonably bright results. Even here, the exposure is a little dim. The camera's Slow-Sync flash mode produced much better results, and at its default exposure setting. Coverage is much more even, though the background incandescent lighting results in a strong orange cast.

Flash power remains pretty strong to about eight feet, but decreases in intensity from there. At the 15 foot test distance, the flash does illuminate the target, but at a very low level. However, this fits in fairly well with Nikon's own flash estimations for the Coolpix L2 (to about nine feet at wide angle, and to about five feet at telephoto).

Print Quality
Good print quality, good color, very usable 11x14 inch prints.

Testing hundreds of digital cameras, we've found that you can only tell just so much about a camera's image quality by viewing its images on-screen. Ultimately, there's no substitute for printing a lot of images and examining them closely. For this reason, we now routinely print sample images from the cameras we test on our Canon i9900 studio printer, and on the Canon iP5200 here in the office. (See the Canon i9900 review for details on that model.)

With the Nikon Coolpix L2, we found that it had enough resolution to make crisp 8x10 inch prints. At 11x14, its prints were a bit softer, but more than adequate for wall or table display, though the softness in the corners does indeed show up at this size. ISO 200 photos look OK printed at 8x10 inches, but it's not until 5x7 that it ceases to matter. Color-wise, the Nikon Coolpix L2's images looked great when printed on the iP5200, with bright, vibrant color. Users who prefer more subdued, technically accurate color saturation levels may find the Nikon L2's images a little too bright, but the target market will like the Nikon L2's colorful images.