Canon G9X II Optics
Lens
Zoom
Limited 3x optical zoom ratio, but with decent far-field performance for its class.
28mm eq., f/5.6 | 50mm eq., f/5.6 |
84mm eq., f/5.6 | 1.6x Digital Teleconverter |
2x Digital Teleconverter | 4x Digital Zoom |
The Canon G9X Mark II's 3x optical zoom lens covers the equivalent of about 28-84mm on a 35mm camera, the same as the G9X. That's a fairly limited zoom ratio and not as wide as most compacts go these days, but that's how Canon kept the G9X-series size so small. Maximum aperture varies from a pretty fast f/2.0 at wide angle to a somewhat slow f/4.9 at full telephoto.
The following table reflects the maximum and minimum apertures as reported by the camera:
Focal length (eq.)
|
28mm | 30mm | 33mm |
35mm
|
46mm
|
55mm
|
70-84mm
|
Max. aperture
|
f/2.0 | f/2.2 | f/2.8 |
f/3.2
|
f/4.0
|
f/4.5
|
f/4.9
|
Min. aperture
|
f/11 at all focal lengths |
Sharpness and contrast are good across much of the frame at maximum wide angle and f/5.6, though corners show some softness because of the strong distortion correction applied (see below). Only a minor amount of chromatic aberration is visible as it is effectively suppressed in JPEGs, and flare is well controlled in this shot. At medium focal length (~50mm eq.), far-field performance appears to be quite good at f/5.6 with excellent sharpness and contrast, and although some CA is visible, it's still fairly well controlled. Results at full telephoto and f/5.6 are quite good, with good sharpness and contrast across the frame. Again, chromatic aberration is low because the G9X II does a good job suppressing it in JPEGs.
The G9X II also offers digital zoom up to 4x, and what Canon calls a "digital teleconverter" at preset magnifications of 1.6x and 2.0x which can be used at any optical focal length. We've included images using those modes above, since optical zoom ratio is limited.
See below for our studio test shots.
Macro
About average size macro area, with very good detail in the center. Flash overexposed at closest focus.
Standard Macro, 28mm eq., f/5.6 | Macro with Flash, 28mm eq., f/11 |
The Canon G9X II's lens captured an average size minimum area of 2.80 x 1.87 inches (71 x 47 millimeters). Sharpness is quite good in the central area of the frame, though corners and edges are quite soft from field curvature. (Most cameras have some softening in the corners in macro mode.) The Canon G9X II's built-in flash didn't throttle down enough at closest distance, overexposing part of the shot even at f/11, and illumination wasn't very even because of the location of the flash. You'll likely want to use external lighting for close macro shots with the G9X II.
Distortion
Very low to moderately low distortion in JPEGs; very high at wide angle in uncorrected RAW files.
In-camera JPEGs |
---|
Mixed distortion at 28mm eq. is about 0.1% |
Barrel distortion at 84mm eq. is about 0.4% |
JPEG: The Canon G9X II's JPEGs show just over 0.1% of complex barrel distortion at wide angle, a sure sign of in-camera correction (see below). The nearly 0.4% barrel distortion at the telephoto end is moderately low and not the pincushion type of distortion we normally see at telephoto. This is the tendency for the lens to bend straight lines outward (like a barrel -- usually at wide angle) or inward (like a pincushion -- usually at telephoto).
Uncorrected RAW |
---|
Barrel distortion at 28mm eq. is about 4.3% |
Barrel distortion at 84mm eq. is about 0.4% |
Uncorrected RAW: When converting RAW files using RawDigger (no corrections applied), we see that actual barrel distortion at wide angle is extremely high, at about 4.3%. Uncorrected distortion at full telephoto is still about 0.4% barrel, so the in-camera JPEG wasn't corrected for geometric distortion a full telephoto. Canon's bundled Digital Photo Professional and Adobe Camera Raw automatically correct for geometric distortion, yielding distortion measurements similar to in-camera JPEGs.
High distortion is quite common at wide angle in smaller lenses these days, and most raw converters will automatically correct for it. There is however going to be a loss of resolution as well as possible interpolation artifacts as a result of such strong correction, because pixels in the corners of the frame are being "stretched" to correct for the distortion. And it's not just the extreme corners as the G9X II's sensor captures much more than the viewfinder shows requiring significant cropping and interpolation back to full 20-megapixel image dimensions. If you look closely at the corners in the G9X II's wide-angle JPEGs, they are not only soft but detail is a little rough with straight edges in the USAF resolution target looking jagged. Obviously, a lens that doesn't require so much correction and is also sharp in the corners to begin with would be preferable, but relaxing constraints on distortion brings other benefits in the lens design, such as a very compact, lower-cost design.
Chromatic Aberration and Corner Softness
CA is very low to moderate at wide angle, and lower at telephoto in JPEGs. Mild to moderate blurring in the corners of the frame at wide angle, but good corner sharpness at full telephoto.
Chromatic Aberration. Lateral chromatic aberration is moderate in the corners at wide angle at maximum aperture, with some wide but fairly faint purple fringing, and there's very little CA in the center. At full telephoto wide open, lateral chromatic aberration is moderately low in the corners, and very low in the center. See below for examples of uncorrected C.A. Chromatic aberration is a type of distortion visible as a slight colored fringe around the objects at the edges of the field of view on the resolution target.
Corner Softness. The Canon G9X II's lens produces moderately soft corners at full wide angle when wide open. Blurring is about the same in all for corners and some softness extends fairly deep into the frame, but the center is quite sharp. Rough edges and much of the softness are due to the strong geometric distortion and CA correction taking place at wide angle. Corners at full telephoto are fairly sharp but not as contrasty as the center with clear signs of CA suppression, while the center is pretty sharp.
Corner Shading. Vignetting is fairly low at either end of the zoom, even wide open.
Stopped Down. When the lens is stopped-down to f/5.6 at wide angle, sharpness didn't improve in the corners and actually degraded a bit, although contrast improved and CA levels were a little lower. At full telephoto stopped down to f/7.1, the corners remained about the same, but the image was slightly softer in the center due to diffraction. Vignetting was reduced and is not significant at either end of the zoom range.
Chromatic Aberration Correction
As expected, chromatic aberrations are much higher in uncorrected RAW files than in camera JPEGs. As you can see, the Canon G9X II's DIGIC 7 image processor does a pretty good job suppressing most of the lateral chromatic aberration in JPEGs (crops on the left) versus RAW files converted in RawDigger (on the right), which does not correct for CA. Also notice how much the images needed to be processed in terms of distortion and sharpness at the wide end, and sharpness at the telephoto end. Note that most commercial converters like Adobe Camera Raw will automatically correct for CA, as the G9X II's .CR2 RAW files have a built-in lens profile.
Overall, not a bad performance for such a compact lens coupled to 1"-type sensor, however optical zoom range is rather limited and there are inevitable tradeoffs at wide angle which need a lot of digital correction.
Viewfinder
Coverage
Very good accuracy from the LCD monitor.
28mm eq., LCD Monitor | 84mm eq., LCD Monitor |
The Canon PowerShot G9X II's LCD monitor displayed very good coverage accuracy in record mode, showing just over 99% coverage at wide angle, and just under 99% coverage at full telephoto. That's pretty impressive considering the amount of digital correction taking place.
The images above were taken from our standardized test shots. For a collection of more pictorial photos, see our Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Photo Gallery .
Follow Imaging Resource