Fuji GFX 50R Image Quality Comparison

Below are crops from our laboratory Still Life target comparing the Fuji GFX 50R's JPEG image quality to its bigger brother's, the 50S. We've also compared it to other high-resolution cameras: the 50-megapixel full-frame Canon 5DS R, the 46-megapixel full-frame Nikon D850, the 51-megapixel medium format Pentax 645Z, and the 42-megapixel full-frame Sony A7R II Mark III.

NOTE: These images are from best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera, at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). All cameras in this comparison were shot with our very sharp reference lenses. Clicking any crop will take you to a carrier page where you can click once again to access the full resolution image as delivered straight from the camera. For those interested in working with the RAW files involved: click these links to visit each camera's respective sample image thumbnail page: Fuji GFX 50R, Fuji GFX 50S, Canon 5DS R, Nikon D850, Pentax 645Z and Sony A7R Mark III -- links to the RAW files appear beneath those for the JPEG images, wherever we have them. And remember, you can always go to our world-renowned Comparometer to compare the Fuji 50R to any camera we've ever tested!

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Fujifilm GFX 50S at Base ISO

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 100
Fujifilm GFX 50S at ISO 100

These two Fuji GFX siblings use the same sensor and processor, so as expected, image quality is practically identical ignoring slight differences in lighting and white balance.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Canon 5DS R at Base ISO

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 100
Canon 5DS R at ISO 100

Here we compare the medium format Fuji GFX 50R to the full-frame Canon 5DS R at base ISO. Although on paper the Fuji has just a slightly higher resolution (51.1MP with a 8256 x 6192 pixel image versus 50.3MP with a 8688 x 5702 image for the Canon), when framed vertically the 4:3 Fuji has a larger advantage over the 3:2 Canon in terms of resolving power than their relative pixel counts would imply. As a result, the Fuji does resolve a bit more detail in this comparison, but it also applies stronger default sharpening and contrast producing a crisper image with more "pop," though with slightly more noticeable sharpening halos as well. (Note that the Canon was shot with Fine Detail Picture Style which does a better job rendering fine detail without visible sharpening artifacts than Canon's Standard Picture Style, but images also have somewhat lower contrast.) The Fuji does however show slightly lower noise levels here at ISO 100, particularly chroma noise in the shadows, but it also doesn't reproduce the subtle offset printing coloration in the mosaic crop. Both cameras show some aliasing artifacts but that is to be expected from cameras without optical low-pass filters. Interestingly, the Canon produces higher contrast in our tricky red-leaf swatch. Both cameras produce very pleasing colors as we've come to expect from Canon and Fuji.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Nikon D850 at Base ISO

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 100
Nikon D850 at ISO 64

Here we compare the 50R to the 45.7-megapixel Nikon D850. Again be aware that the GFX's sensor has a 4:3 aspect ratio while the D850 has a 3:2 aspect ratio, so the GFX has more of a resolution advantage over the 3:2 cameras than their relative pixel counts would imply here, as we frame this shot vertically. (The D850 and GFX both produce images with 8256 pixels in the horizontal axis, but the Fuji yields 6192 pixels in the vertical, versus 5504 pixels for the Nikon.) As you can see, the GFX handily out-resolves the D850 and has lower noise levels as well. Both produce very crisp images, but the Fuji generates less obvious sharpening halos around high-contrast edges. The Nikon produces higher contrast though, particularly in our tricky red-leaf swatch. Both cameras offer pleasing, vibrant color though the Nikon is a bit warmer and overall the Fuji's colors are a little more accurate.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Pentax 645Z at Base ISO

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 100
Pentax 645Z at ISO 100

The Fuji 50R and Pentax 645Z use very similar if not identical sensors, so it's no surprise they both resolve very similar levels of detail. The Fuji's image appears crisper due to more sophisticated default processing and perhaps a slightly better lens, and it has more pleasing, accurate colors as well. The Pentax on the other hand produces much better contrast in our red-leaf swatch but it renders the pink fabric much too magenta. As expected, both show some aliasing artifacts.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony A7R III at Base ISO

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 100
Sony A7R III at ISO 100

The 51MP medium format 50R readily out-resolves Sony's 42-megapixel full-frame A7R III mirrorless, though again when framed vertically like this, the 4:3 aspect ratio Fuji has a larger advantage over the 3:2 Sony in terms of resolving power than their relative pixel counts would imply. The Fuji exhibits lower chroma noise in the shadows, but the Sony does a better job at reproducing the offset printing coloration in the mosaic crop. Sharpening halos are practically nonexistent from the Sony, but they aren't very obtrusive from the Fuji either. Both cameras produce aliasing artifacts but the difference in resolution happens to make moiré patterns more visible from the Sony in our red-leaf swatch. The A7R III renders much higher contrast in our red-leaf swatch than the 50R , however overall color is warmer and more accurate from the Fuji.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Fujifilm GFX 50S at ISO 1600

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 1600
Fujifilm GFX 50S at ISO 1600

Again, nearly identical image quality from these two medium format siblings here at ISO 1600, as expected.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Canon 5DS R at ISO 1600

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 1600
Canon 5DS R at ISO 1600

The Fuji 50R's image quality advantage over the Canon 5DS R increases here a ISO 1600, with the Canon producing much higher luminance noise as can be readily seen in flatter areas, and as a consequence, its default noise reduction begins to blur fine detail more than the Fuji. This is particularly evident in the red-leaf swatch which has become noticeably softer with much of the fine thread pattern blurred away. The Fuji has also lost some subtle detail in the red-leaf fabric, though not to the same extent. Contrast in the red-leaf swatch does however remain better from the Canon.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Nikon D850 at ISO 1600

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 1600
Nikon D850 at ISO 1600

The Fuji GFX 50R easily bests the Nikon D850 here at ISO 1600, with much better detail and clarity, lower noise and a tighter noise "grain," though contrast is a bit higher from the D850.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Pentax 645Z at ISO 1600

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 1600
Pentax 645Z at ISO 1600

Here at ISO 1600, the Fuji 50R produces a noticeably cleaner, crisper and brighter image even though the amount of detail preserved is still comparable. However most of the difference is due to better JPEG processing from the Fuji, as noise levels in RAW files appear very similar. Subtle detail in our tricky red-leaf swatch has been degraded more by the Pentax, however contrast is still a bit better. The Fuji continues to produce better colors.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony A7R III at ISO 1600

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 1600
Sony A7R III at ISO 1600

Here at ISO 1600, the Fuji 50R continues to easily out-resolve the Sony A7R III as expected. Both show similar levels of luminance noise however the Fuji's grain pattern is a bit more regular and film-like, and it leaves behind much lower chroma noise. The Sony still shows much higher contrast in our tricky red-leaf swatch along with more obvious moiré patterns, however the Fuji's low-contrast rendering doesn't suffer from the Sony's somewhat peppered look.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Fujifilm GFX 50S at ISO 3200

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 3200
Fujifilm GFX 50S at ISO 3200

Yet again, as expected the two Fuji siblings produce practically identical image quality here at ISO 3200.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Canon 5DS R at ISO 3200

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 3200
Canon 5DS R at ISO 3200

The Fuji 50R's image quality continues to pull away from the Canon 5DS R's at ISO 3200, with a much cleaner, crisper, more detailed image all around. The Canon's default noise reduction is working pretty hard at this point, which unfortunately blurs and distorts fine detail while still leaving behind a lot of noise "grain".

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Nikon D850 at ISO 3200

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 3200
Nikon D850 at ISO 3200

Again, an easy win for the 50R here at ISO 3200 with a sharper, more detailed yet cleaner image, though contrast continues to be better from the D850.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Pentax 645Z at ISO 3200

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 3200
Pentax 645Z at ISO 3200

Here at ISO 3200, the GFX 50R continues to produce a noticeably cleaner, crisper and punchier JPEG image with better color than the 645Z. And again, the leaf pattern in our tricky red-leaf swatch has been blurred a little more by the Pentax's default noise reduction.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs Sony A7R III at ISO 3200

Fujifilm GFX 50R at ISO 3200
Sony A7R III at ISO 3200

Again, the Fuji GFX 50R bests the Sony A7R III in this comparison at ISO 3200, producing a cleaner, crisper, more detailed image with lower chroma noise and fewer noise reduction artifacts. The Sony continues to produce better contrast in our troublesome red-leaf swatch, however subtle detail is more distorted than from the Fuji.

Fujifilm GFX 50R vs. Fujifilm GFX 50S, Canon 5DS R, Nikon D850, Pentax 645Z, Sony A7R III

Fujifilm
GFX 50R
ISO 100
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Fujifilm
GFX 50S
ISO 100
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Canon
5DS R
ISO 100
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Nikon
D850
ISO 64
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Pentax
645Z
ISO 100
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Sony
A7R III
ISO 100
ISO 3200
ISO 6400
Detail comparison. High-contrast detail is also important, pushing the camera in different ways, so we like to look at it, too. The 50R does a little better than its predecessor here, offering slightly better contrast at higher ISOs, but it's pretty close. The Pentax 645Z performs similarly as expected, however clarity doesn't appear to be quite as good, at least at high ISOs. The Nikon D850 and Sony A7R III both perform very well, but obviously don't resolve as much detail as the Fujis. Trailing the pack here is the Canon 5DS R, with lower contrast, higher noise and more visible lens aberrations, although the latter can be mitigated with in-camera lens corrections, at least when using Canon optics.

 

Fuji GFX 50R Print Quality Analysis

Wonderfully detailed 30 x 40-inch prints up to ISO 3200; Usable 11 x 14-inch prints up to ISO 25,600; Nice 8 x 10-inch prints all the way until ISO 51,200!

ISO 50 through 3200 images are, much like its GFX 50S sibling's, packed with a fantastic level of detail and resolution, and offer really clean noise behavior as the ISO rises. As with the 50S, the 50R here is easily capable of providing sharp, clear prints all the way up to 30 x 40 inches -- or larger, depending on how large of a print you need or how much you're willing to push the resolving power of the 51MP sensor. 30 x 40 is just the largest print size we can test. Up to ISO 400, images are pretty much identical, and we only start to see a hint of fine-grained shadow noise at ISO 800, which doesn't negatively affect the print quality size. Throughout this ISO range, prints are super crisp with tons of resolution, and colors are pleasing and nicely saturated. A stunning print quality performance from the GFX 50R!

When you reach ISO 3200, we do see a bit more shadow noise, though it's still very finely-grained and not distracting nor impacting fine detail or color. At this ISO, the camera still produces an excellent 30 x 40-inch print. Unlike the lower ISO levels where prints larger than 30 x 40 are possible, here we'd recommend stopping right at 30 x 40 inches; any larger and noise might become an issue.

ISO 6400 images start to show more visible noise as well as signs of noise reduction processing, reducing very fine detail to some degree. The noise itself remains film-like and finely grained, though. Despite the seemingly high ISO, the level of noise is still well controlled overall, and there is still a ton of crisp, fine detail, easily allowing for prints up to an impressively large 24 x 36 inches. Detail is excellent, and despite the increase in shadow/background noise, it's not likely to have a negative effect given the typical viewing distance for a print of this size.

ISO 12,800 prints top-out at 16 x 20 inches; an impressively large print for this sensitivity. Color is still rich, and the prints still have nice contrast. However, noise has noticeably increased and has reduced fine detail in some lower-contrast areas, which make printing larger sizes not recommended.

ISO 25,600 images just pass the mark at 11 x 14 inches, which is still quite remarkable. We've now reached into the GFX 50R's expanded ISO range, and noise is noticeably stronger now, taking its toll on subtler, finer detail.

ISO 51,200 prints match the benchmark reached by the GFX 50S: 8 x 10 inches. At this print size, noise is surprisingly well controlled and the print has lots of detail throughout. In the shadows, a combination of noise and noise reduction processing reduces fine detail to a degree, displaying a somewhat mottled appearance in some areas. Colors also appear slightly less vibrant.

ISO 102,400 images finally reach the breaking point, displaying too much noise and too little detail for us to consider acceptable when it comes to prints. Perhaps a 4 x 6-inch print would work for less critical applications, but we'd rather avoid this ISO if possible.

Just like the bigger GFX 50S, the rangefinder-esque GFX 50R is an absolutely fantastic camera for printmaking, which shouldn't be surprising, given its medium-format sensor. This 51MP camera packs an incredible amount of resolving power and refined image processing, making it capable of fantastic prints at up to 30 x 40 images all the way up to ISO 3200! Below ISO 3200, you could make even larger prints, but we hit the size limit of our testing. As the ISO increases, the GFX 50R displays excellent noise control, with very gradual increases in noise; and the noise that we do see is very finely-grained. As such, the camera is capable of impressive feats, such as a 24 x 36 inch print at ISO 6400 and an 11 x 14 inch print at ISO 25,600. At ISO 51,200, the GFX 50R manages a shockingly usable 8 x 10 despite this super-high ISO sensitivity -- an achievement shared only by GFX 50S in our tests. At the maximum expanded ISO of 102,400, however, images are too noisy and soft for our taste, and this ISO should be avoided for serious prints.