Sony QX1 vs Fujifilm X70

Cameras
Compare Cameras
Sony QX1 vs Fujifilm X70

Leave Feedback

APS-C 357.3mm²
20.1 megapixels
ISO 100 - 16,000

Go in depth with our full Sony QX1 Review.

APS-C 368.2mm²
16.3 megapixels
28.00mm (35mm eq.)

Go in depth with our full Fujifilm X70 Review.
How does it shoot? Fujifilm X70 in the real world.
See real-world photos taken with the X70.
Compare Fujifilm X70 image quality against competitors.
What’s the bottom line? Read our Fujifilm X70 conclusion.

Succeeded by the Fujifilm XF10
Compare X70 vs XF10
Compare Sony QX1 vs Fujifilm XF10

Buy From

Differences

Sony QX1 advantages over Fujifilm X70

Longer stills battery life
More info

Longer stills battery life

Cameras with longer battery life can take more photos before exhausting their batteries.

Special note: The measurement standard for battery life stipulates that if a camera has an internal flash, it must be used for 50% of photos taken. For this reason, comparisons of one camera with an internal flash to another without will not be comparable

440 vs 330 shots
Capture more photos
Lighter weight
216g vs 347g
Lighter weight
More pixels
20.1 vs 16.3 megapixels
Higher resolution photos
Bigger JPEG buffer
15 vs 10 shots
Take more JPEG shots before waiting (burst mode)

Fujifilm X70 advantages over Sony QX1

Rear display
Yes vs No
Review photos on the back of the camera
Touchscreen
Touch vs No touch
Interact with your camera just like your smartphone
In-camera panoramas
Yes vs No
Stitches multiple shots into a panoramic photo
Tiltable Screen
Tiltable vs Fixed
Tilt the screen for shooting flexbility
On-sensor phase detect
Yes vs No
Usually improves live view and video AF performance
External Mic Jack
Jack vs No jack
Improved sound fidelity when shooting video
Higher max flash sync
1/2000 vs 1/160 sec
Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots
HDMI out
HDMI out vs None
Use HDMI output to monitor or review video
Shoots 24p video
Yes vs No
Gives your movies a big-screen feel
Hot shoe
Hot shoe vs None
Off-camera flashes open new possibilities
Shoots 60p video
Yes vs No
A faster framerate can give you more editing options
Doesn't require an AA filter
Yes vs No
A unique sensor design provides sharp photos without moiré
Bulb shutter
Bulb vs No bulb
Hold the shutter open manually for long exposures
Faster JPEG shooting
8.5 fps vs 3.5 fps
Faster JPEG shooting (burst mode)
Faster shutter
1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec
Shoot wide open in bright light
Higher extended ISO
51200 vs 16000 ISO
Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility

Similarities

Common Strengths

Focus peaking
Both provide
Your camera will highlight what's in focus
RAW file ability
Both provide
Gives you more flexibility to develop your photos later
Built-in Wi-Fi
Both provide
Share your photos wirelessly
Internal flash
Both provide
Useful in a pinch for fill flash
Manual focus
Both provide
AF is for the weak. Real photographers focus manually.

Common Weaknesses

Eye-level viewfinder
Neither provide
You'll be able to frame photos even when the sun is out
In-Camera Image Stabilization
Neither provide
Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds
Built-in Bluetooth
Neither provide
Always-on wireless connectivity
Built-in GPS
Neither provide
Geotag your photos
Integrated ND filter
Neither provide
Shoot in daylight with a large aperture or slow shutter
Dual card slots
Neither provide
Gives you more storage flexibility
Headphone jack
Neither provide
Monitor audio recording while you shoot video
Slow-motion videos
Neither provide
Shoot slow-motion videos

User reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read QX1 User Reviews

Amazon
Adorama
Read X70 User Reviews

Buy From

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Sony QX1

Sony QX1

All QX1 Deals

Your purchases support this site

Buy the Fujifilm X70

Fuji X70 (Black)

Fuji X70 (Black)
Fuji X70 (Silver)

All X70 Deals

Review Excerpt

We haven’t reviewed the Sony QX1.
Read our Sony QX1 Preview

Compact camera body; Impressive optical performance; Very good JPEG image quality; Good high ISO performance; Film Simulation modes; Tilting touchscreen display.
Inconsistent AF performance; Clunky menus; Shallow buffer depth; Poor video quality; No built-in viewfinder like X100-series.
Read our Fujifilm X70 Review

The Competition

Compared to Nikon Coolpix A

Sony QX1

Nikon Coolpix A

$498
APS-C

Less expensive
Focus peaking

$1097
APS-C

Rear display
Thinner

Compare Sony QX1 vs Nikon Coolpix A

Fujifilm X70

Nikon Coolpix A

$699
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$1097
APS-C

Bigger JPEG buffer
Bigger RAW buffer

Compare Fujifilm X70 vs Nikon Coolpix A

Compared to Samsung NX2000

Sony QX1

Samsung NX2000

$498
APS-C

Lens selection
Less expensive

$680
APS-C

Rear display
Touchscreen

Compare Sony QX1 vs Samsung NX2000

Fujifilm X70

Samsung NX2000

$699
APS-C

Tiltable Screen
On-sensor phase detect

$680
APS-C

Lighter weight
More pixels

Compare Fujifilm X70 vs Samsung NX2000

Compared to Leica X-E (Typ 102)

Sony QX1

Leica X-E (Typ 102)

$498
APS-C

Focus peaking
Less expensive

$1534
APS-C

Rear display
Higher max flash sync

Compare Sony QX1 vs Leica X-E (Typ 102)

Fujifilm X70

Leica X-E (Typ 102)

$699
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$1534
APS-C

More telephoto lens reach

Compare Fujifilm X70 vs Leica X-E (Typ 102)

Compared to Samsung NX3300

Sony QX1

Samsung NX3300

$498
APS-C

Less expensive
Lens selection

$691
APS-C

Rear display
In-camera panoramas

Compare Sony QX1 vs Samsung NX3300

Fujifilm X70

Samsung NX3300

$699
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$691
APS-C

NFC
Lighter weight

Compare Fujifilm X70 vs Samsung NX3300

Compared to Ricoh GR II

Sony QX1

Ricoh GR II

$498
APS-C

Focus peaking
Longer stills battery life

$538
APS-C

Rear display
Integrated ND filter

Compare Sony QX1 vs Ricoh GR II

Fujifilm X70

Ricoh GR II

$699
APS-C

Focus peaking
Touchscreen

$538
APS-C

Less expensive
NFC

Compare Fujifilm X70 vs Ricoh GR II

Compare Other Cameras?